surfking wrote
Haven't you kinda answered your own question? If you are not going to be racing and constantly exploring the 12krpm mark any of the above options would be fine wouldn't they? It just depends on how you picture the bike in your head.
After much umming and aahing I picked up a rebuilt 999RS engine to replace the cooked unit in my 749R race bike, but only after talking to a couple of RS experts in your neck of the woods. They both pretty much said the same thing: treat an RS like a road engine and it will outlast and outperform a modified road engine treated like an RS. An RS at WSB level makes 190 odd hp at 13krpm (13.5krpm if you are Chili and never look at the tacho, lol), but needs rebuilding every 500km's. I'm happy with my RS making a relatively unstressed 168rwhp at 11.5krpm, should last ages....whereas a 999R built to make that sort of grunt is going to be living on borrowed time.
It's like that "90% of the wear happens on start up" mantra is turned on it's head for race engines: 90% of the stress occurs in the last 10% of the rev range.
Sorry, this is a long winded way of saying if you just run a real world redline rather than a BSB/WSB-spec redline even the old race cases will be relatively unstressed, especially if they are sand cast.
I'm a romantic but it seems kind of a shame to have most of the bits to build a very cool old race bike and put an St4S engine it. But "needs must", what constitutes a "strong fast motor"?
EDIT: apologies for the waffle, it's a quiet nightshift!