workslorenz wroteIt's not only a question of valves but also of model of combustion chamber and heigh of the head or then are trouble to make appropriate squish and compression ratio
As he's said...
They'll be a need to reshape the combustion chambers to unshroud the new bigger valves.
...and there's more than one way to skin that particular cat.
I have 6 pairs of Desmoquatro heads in my workshop, apart from the early '91 851 32/28 valve combustion chambers all the others had the same shape comb' chambers originally.
These are '92 851, 888, 916 (these have 33/29 valves), 916SP and 888 "G" Corse heads that had 34/30 valves originally.
My modified 916SP heads now have 36/31 valves with "ROTAX" shaped comb' chambers to unshroud the bigger valves, I then skimmed them by 1mm to restore most of the comp' ratio lost by the unshrouding, they now run 11.8-1 comp' ration using flat top 94mm 916cc pistons with the valve pockets opened out to suit the big valves.
My modified "G" heads now run 37/32 valves with a comb' shape very similar to 999 Testastretta heads, using these with 96mm raised crown PISTAL pistons for Corse 955cc, resulted in the need to remove 1mm from the PISTAL's crowns and opening out the valve pockets to suit the new valves, still resulted in a comp' ratio of 12-1.
I like around 12-1 because it works well without the need to run race fuel, running quite happily on Super/Shell V Power 98/99 RON street fuel.
I run my heads at 0.8mm squish clearance to be on the safe side.
Steve R